NLRB Changes the Game with Regulations Streamlining Union Elections

By Marina Blickley Litigation Associate Labor and Employment Group, Venable LLP | April 01, 2012

Co-authored by Greg Ossi, Partner, Venable LLP

When President Obama was elected in 2008 there was significant speculation regarding how actively he would pursue a pro-union agenda. However, the push for healthcare reform coupled with the declining economy stymied legislative efforts to aid union organization. For example, the union-backed Employee Free Choice Act failed to win passage in Congress. Now, more than three years later, a similar pro-union initiative appears to be quickly on the rise through the administrative process.

The National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB" or "Board"), the quasi-judicial body charged with interpreting and enforcing the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA"), recently undertook rulemaking designed to make unionization easier in the future. This rulemaking began in the summer of 2011 when the NLRB consisted of just one republican, Member Brian Hayes, and three democrats, Chairman Wilma Liebman and Members Craig Becker and Mark Pearce.

On June 22, 2011, the Board published proposed changes to the regulations governing union elections which, if enacted, would change the way a union representation campaign is run. Most notably, the proposed rule would shorten the timeline from petition to election, making it much more difficult for an employer to express its view of unionization. According to the Board, the twenty proposed changes were necessary to "simplify representation-case procedures" and "eliminate unnecessary litigation, and consolidate requests for Board review of regional directors' pre- and post-election determinations into a single post-election request." In practice, many of the proposed changes were seen by the employer community, including many restaurant and hospitality associations nationwide, as clearly designed to favor unionization and limit an employer's ability to provide employees with the company's position if a union were to seek to organize a workforce.

After the proposed rules were published the Board received over 65,000 written comments from interested parties such as labor organizations, chambers of commerce, and business groups. However, 90% of the total comments were found by the Board to be either "duplicates, near duplicates, devoid of analysis or irrelevant" and thus were not considered or reviewed. In addition, on July 18 and 19, 2011 the Board held a two day hearing where sixty six parties were heard by the Board for about five minutes each.

By November, Chairman Wilma Liebman's appointment had expired and Member Craig Becker's appoint was set to expire at the end of the year. Because the Board must act with at least a 3-member quorum, the Board had to move quickly to approve the proposed modifications prior to substantially losing its ability to act. Thus, in late November the Board (with a 2-1 party-line vote) voted in favor of adopting some of the proposed amendments and the final regulations were published in the Federal Register on December 22, 2011. Notably, a number of the most controversial proposals were not included in the final rule, although the Board reserved its right to act on the proposals at a later time.

Choose a Social Network!

The social network you are looking for is not available.

Close

Hotel Newswire Headlines Feed  

Alan Villaverde
Jim Holthouser
Kelly McGuire
Mike Kistner
Tema Frank
Leora Halpern Lanz
Pedro Colaco
Lily Mockerman
S. Lakshmi Narasimhan
Jerry Tarasofsky
Coming up in June 2019...

Sales & Marketing: Selling Experiences

There are innumerable strategies that Hotel Sales and Marketing Directors employ to find, engage and entice guests to their property, and those strategies are constantly evolving. A breakthrough technology, pioneering platform, or even a simple algorithm update can cause new trends to emerge and upend the best laid plans. Sales and marketing departments must remain agile so they can adapt to the ever changing digital landscape. As an example, the popularity of virtual reality is on the rise, as 360 interactive technologies become more mainstream. Chatbots and artificial intelligence are also poised to become the next big things, as they take guest personalization to a whole new level. But one sales and marketing trend that is currently resulting in major benefits for hotels is experiential marketing - the effort to deliver an experience to potential guests. Mainly this is accomplished through the creative use of video and images, and by utilizing what has become known as User Generated Content. By sharing actual personal content (videos and pictures) from satisfied guests who have experienced the delights of a property, prospective guests can more easily imagine themselves having the same experience. Similarly, Hotel Generated Content is equally important. Hotels are more than beds and effective video presentations can tell a compelling story - a story about what makes the hotel appealing and unique. A video walk-through of rooms is essential, as are video tours in different areas of a hotel. The goal is to highlight what makes the property exceptional, but also to show real people having real fun - an experience that prospective guests can have too. The June Hotel Business Review will report on some of these issues and strategies, and examine how some sales and marketing professionals are integrating them into their operations.